I've done a write-up of "Ecstatic occasions, expedient forms", David Lehman (ed) (Univ of Michigan, 1996) in which poets explain their forms. A mixed bag of scientific and mystical explanations -
- "Since it is not my custom to capitalize the initial word of each line, I decided to experiment with this convention"
- "it's foolish to think a line should break so that the reader might rest or so an end word can shiver and throb in order to call more attention to itself"
- "I broke the poem into quatrains for the purpose of making a better shape on the page"
- "an eight-syllable line with no regular meter, no counting of stresses. It is almost free verse broken into an arbitrary length. ... I like this form because it leaves the musical cadence almost entirely free to follow the content. ... yet has some of the surface tension of regularity. "
etc. Some of the poets decided not to mention the form even though it was overt.
No comments:
Post a Comment